The Occult Matrix
Recently Updated as of 2017 - This Website is Completely AD FREE - Please Support Me Via Paypal, Promoted Products and Bitcoin or Etherium

Welcome Page About Me Announcements Personal Writings Knowledge Base News Articles
Video Links Digital Downloads Shop Store Suggested Reading Links Page Contact Me

Constitution & Law

Upside Down Distress Flag

"The ultimate authority...resides in the people alone."
-James Madison, author of the Bill of Rights, in Federalist Paper No. 46. 

"No man is good enough to govern another man without that other's consent." -Abraham Lincoln

"The presumption is simply that the weaker party consent to be slaves.   Such is the

presumption on which alone our government relies to justify the power it maintains over
it's unwilling subjects.  The real motives and spirit which lie at the foundation of all
legislation are the same today as they always have been -- to keep one class of men in
subordination and servitude to another." --Lysander Spooner

    "When plunder becomes a way of life for a group of men living together in society,
they create for themselves, in the course of time, a legal system that authorizes it and a
moral code that glorifies it." -- Fred Bastiat - Around 1850

    "Everyone wants to live at the expense of the State, they forget that the State exists at
the expense of everyone" -- Fred Bastiat - Around 1850

"Life, liberty, and property do not exist because men have made laws. On the contrary, it was the fact that life, liberty, and property existed beforehand that caused men to make laws in the first place."
-Frederic Bastiat

"See if the law takes from some persons what belongs to them, and gives it to other persons to whom it does not belong. See if the law benefits one citizen at the expense of another by doing what the citizen himself cannot do without committing a crime." -Frederic Bastiat

The People over their servants ------ Principle over the agent!!

“In this state as in all republics, it is not the Legislature, however translucent it’s powers, who are supreme- but the people- and to suppose that they may violate the fundamental law, is, as has been most eloquently expressed, to affirm that the deputy is greater than his principle; that the servant is above his master; that the representatives of the people are superior to the people themselves; that men acting by virtue of delegated power may do not only what their powers do not authorize, but what they forbid.”  Waring v. Mayor of Savannah, 60 Georgia page 93

  “In enacting this chapter, the Legislature finds and declares that the public commissions, boards
and councils and other public agencies in this state exist to aid in the conduct of  the people’s business. It is the intent of the law that their actions be taken openly and that their deliberations be conducted openly.
The people of this state do not yield their sovereignty to the agencies which serve them. The people, in delegating authority, do not give their public servants the right to decide what is good for the people to know and what is not good for them to know. The people insist on remaining
informed so that they may retain control over the instruments they have create.” -------
California Government Code Section 54950.

            supreme Court in the county!! --------Justices’ Courts
“Upon a change from Territorial to State government the seals in use by the Supreme Court
and the Territorial District courts in and for the several counties respectively, shall pass to and become until otherwise provided by law, the seals respectively, of the Supreme Court and of
the District Courts of the State in such counties”.  --------- Constitution of Montana, 1889,
Article XX, section 6

    1994 MCA Special Session Edition    Jurisdiction Over Appeals From Justices’ Courts : The Supreme Court does not have appellate jurisdiction to review the judgements or orders of the Justices’ Courts. Adair v. Lake County Justice Court, 213 M 466, 692 P2d 13, 41 St. Rep. 2241 (1984); State ex rel. Estes v. Justice Court, 129 M 136, 284 P2d 249 (1955).

    1994 MCA Special Session Edition     Section 5.  Self Government Charters. (1)   The Legislature shall provide procedures permitting a local government unit or combination of units to frame, adopt, amend, revise, or abandon a self-government charter with the approval of a majority of those voting on the question. The procedures shall not require approval of a charter by a legislative body.
(2)     If the legislature does not provide such procedures by July 1, 1975, they may be established
by election either:
(a)     Initiated by petition in the local government unit or combination of units; or
(b)     Called by the governing body of the local government unit or combination of units.
(3)     Charter provisions establishing executive, legislative, and administrative structure and
organization are superior to statutory provisions.

     1994 MCA Special Session Edition    Art. XI, Sec. 5, Mont. Const.—Official Comment
New provision directing legislature to pass laws concerning procedures for local voters to design their own forms of government (self-government charters). The charter provisions concerning structure of local governments would take precedence over general laws on
such matters.

   “The Legislative Assembly shall not pass local or special laws in any of the following enumerated cases, that is to say : regulating county or township affairs; regulating the practice in Courts of Justice; regulating the jurisdiction and duties of Justices of the peace, police magistrates or constables; changing the rules of evidence in any trial or inquiry; providing for changes of venue in civil or criminal cases; for limitation of civil actions; summoning or empaneling grand or petit juries; for the punishment of crimes; for the assess-ment or collection of taxes; changing the law of
descent; creating offices, or prescribing the powers or duties of officers in counties, cities, township or school districts;” Montana Constitution, Article 5, sec.26

  Who is bound by the Constitution and laws of the legislature?

2.   This constitution, and the laws of the united states which shall be made in pursuance thereof, , and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land : and the judges, in every state, shall be bound thereby, anything in the constitution or laws of any state to the contrary notwithstanding.
3.    The senators and representatives before mentioned, and the members of the several state legislatures, and all executive and judicial officers, both of the united states and of the several states shall be bound, by oath or affirmation to support this constitution; but no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the united states.  --U.S. Constitution Article VI Section 2 & 3

    "When a change of government takes place, from a monarchial to a republican government,
the old form is dissolved. Those who lived under it, and did not choose to become members of the
new, had a right to refuse their allegiance to it, and to retire elsewhere. By being a part of the
society subject to the old government, they had not entered into any engagement to become subject to any new form the majority might think proper to adopt. That the majority shall prevail is a rule posterior to the formation of government, and results from it. It is not a rule binding upon mankind in their natural state. There, every man is independent of all laws, except those prescribed by nature. He is not bound by any institutions formed by his fellowmen without his consent." CRUDEN v. NEALE, 2 N.C. 338 (1796) 2 S.E. 70. Emphasis added.

    “Time does not confirm a void act.”  California Civil Code section 3539


Various Areas of Law Legal Definitions


    "All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void." --
Marbury vs. Madison, 5 US 137, 174, 176 (1803)

  "All that government does and provides legitimately is in pursuit of it's duty to
provide protection for private rights (Wynhammer v. People, 13 NY 378), which
duty is a debt owed to it's creator, WE THE PEOPLE and the private
unenfranchised individual; which debt and duty is never extinguished nor
discharged, and is perpetual. No matter what the government/state provides for us
in manner of convenience and safety, the unenfranchised individual owes nothing
to the government." Hale v. Henkel, 201 U.S. 43

    "Government does not exist, in a personal sense, for the purpose of acquiring,
protecting and enjoying property. It exists primarily for the protection of the
people in their individual rights, and holds property not primarily for the
enjoyment of property accumulations, but as an incident to the purpose for which
it exists ---that of serving the people and protecting them in their rights.
Curley vs U.S., 130 F. 1, 8, 64 C.C.A. 369

    "An unconstitutional act is not law; it confers no rights; it imposes no duties;
affords no protection; it creates no office; it is in legal contemplation, as
inoperative as though it had never been passed." -- Norton vs. Shelby County,
118, US 425 p. 442

    "The general rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having the form
and name of law, is in reality no law, but is wholly void, and ineffective for any
purpose; since unconstitutionality dates from the time of it's enactment, and not
merely from the date of the decision so branding it. No one is bound to obey an
unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it." -- 16 Am Jur 2d, Sec. 177,
late 2d, Sec 256
"Our freedom of speech, under the First Amendment, also protects a person's
right to have access to information, i.e. the right to hear and read.   (See: Va. State
Bd. of Pharmacy v. Va. Citizen's Consumers Council, Inc., (1976) 425 U.S. 748

    "A free press stands as one of the greater interpreters between the government
and the people. To allow it to be fettered is to fetter ourselves."
Grosjean v. American Press Co. 56 S Ct. 444 (1936)

     "No agreement with a foreign nation can confer power on the Congress, or on
any other branch of government, which is free from the resraints of the
Constitution."  Supreme Court in Reid v. Covert, 354 U.S. 1 (1957)

"Invito beneficium non datur- No one is obliged to accept a benefit against his consent." Bouvier's Law Dictionary (1914), "Maxim," p, 2140).[No officer can compel any Good and Lawful Man to get a license, benefit, or privilege in commerce.]

Common Law

   "The Constitution is to be interpreted according to Common Law Rules." --
Schick vs. U.S., 195 US 65, 24 Sup. Ct. 826, 49 L. Ed. 99

    "...a Statute will not be construed so as to overrule a principle of established
Common Law, unless it is made plain by the act that such a change in the
established law is intended." -- Starkey Construction Inc. vs. Elcon, Inc., 248 Ark 958, 978A,
457 SW 2nd 509, 7 U.C.C.RS 923

    "A statute should be construed in harmony with the Common Law unless there
is a clear legislative intent to abrogate the Common Law." --United Bank vs. Mesa
Nelson Co., 121 Ariz 438, 590 P2d 1384, 25 U.C.C.RS 1113

    "The Constitution is to be construed with respect to the law existing at the time
of it's adoption and as securing to the individual citizen the rights inherited by him
under English Law, and not with reference to new guarantees." --Mattox vs. U.S.,
156 US 237, 15 Sup Ct. 337, 39 L. Ed. 409

    "It [U.S. Constitution] must be interpreted in the light of Common Law, the
principles and history of which were familiarly known to the framers of the
Constitution. Th language of the Constitution could not be understood without
reference to the Common Law." -- U.S. vs. Wong Kim, Ark, 169 US 649, 18 S. Ct. 456

Sovereignty (State and Individual)

    "For when the [American] revolution took place, the people of each state
became themselves sovereign; and in that character hold the absolute right to all
their navigable waters, and the soils under them, for their own common use,
subject only to the rights since surrendured by the Constitution to the general
government." -- Martin vs. Waddell, 41 US (16 Pet) 367, 410 (1842)

    "People of a state are entitled to all rights which formerly belonged to the King
by his prerogative." -- Lansing vs. Smith, 21 D.89

   "Sovereignty itself is, of course, not subject to law, for it is the author and
source of law; but in our system, while sovereign powers are delegated to the
agencies of government, sovereignty itself, remains with the people, by whom and
for whom all government exists and acts. And the law is the definition and
limitation of power." -- Justice Matthews in Yick Wo v Hopkins, 118 US 356

    "There is no such thing as a power of inherent sovereignty in the government
of the [federal] United States... In this country sovereignty resides in the people,
and Congress can exercise no power which they [the sovereign people] have not,
by their Constitution entrusted to it: All else is withheld." -- Supreme Court Justice Field

    "Land Patents are issues (and theoretically passed) between Sovereigns. Deeds
are executed by 'persons' and private corporations without these sovereign
powers." -- Leading Fighter vs. County of Gregory, 230 N.W.2d. 114.116 (1975)

     "As long as the Constitution endured, this supreme Court must exist with it,
deciding in peaceful forms of judicial proceedings the angry and irritating
controversies between sovereignties." -- Judge Taney
Point: If the "Individual People" were not the
true Sovereigns, how could he say this? (Above)
This is a "Proof" that the Individual People are
the TRUE SOVEREIGNS above government!!

Person vs. People (Artificial Persons vs. Natural Persons)

    "The word "person" in legal terminology is perceived as a general word which
normally includes in it's scope a variety of entities other than human beings.
See e.g. 1 U.S.C. ss 1. Church of Scientology v. U.S. Dept. of Justice (1979) 612 F 2d 417, 425.

Citizenship (State v. Federal or U.S.)

    "While the 14th Amendment does not create a national citizenship, it has the effect of making that
citizenship 'paramount and dominant' " -- Supreme Court, Colgate vs. Harvey 296 U.S. 404, 427;
80 L. Ed. 299 1935; See page 309 Lawyers Ed.

United States of America vs. UNITED STATES INC.

    "Governments descend to the level of a mere private corporation and take on
the characteristics of a mere private citizen where private corporate commercail
paper [federal reserve notes] and securities [checks] is concerned..." -- Clearfield
Trust Company v. United States, 318 U.S. 363-371, 1942

    "When governments enter the world of commerce, they are subject to the same
burdens as any private firm or corporation" -- U.S. v. Burr, 309 U.S. 242
See: 22 U.S.C.A.286e, Bank of U.S. vs. Planters Bank of Georgia, 6L, Ed. (9 Wheat) 244;
22 U.S.C.A. 286 et seq., C.R.S. 11-60-103

Licenses (Business)

    "No state shall convert a liberty into a privelege; license it, and attach a fee to
it." Murdoch v. Penn., 318 U.S. 105

"Right to Travel" Issue

"Original 13th Amendment (Titles of Nobility)" Issue
(Very Important!!)
"If any Citizen of the United States shall accept, claim, receive, or retain any
title of nobility or honour, or shall, without the consent of Congress, accept and
retain any present, pension, office or emolument of any kind whatever, from any
emperor, King prince, or foreign power, such person shall cease to be a Citizen of
the United States, and shall be incapable of holding any office of trust or profit
under them, or either of them."-- ORIGINAL 13th AMENDMENT RATIFIED 1820

"14th Amendment" Issue
"While the Union survived the Civil War, the Constitution did it's place
arose a more promising basis for justice and equality, the 14th Amendment." --
Associate Justice Thurgood Marshall , May 6th 1987

"Income Tax-16th Amendment" Issue
The I.R.S. was created in Delaware, July 11, 1933. Entered into a service agreement with the
United States Treasury Dept. and Agency for International Development (A.I.D.) (Treasury
Delegation Order No. 91 & 22 U.S.C.A. 611(c)(iii)
The A.I.D. is a paramilitary operation focusing on creating a dictatorship over finance in the
United States. (1985 Edition Dept. Army Field Manual, FM 41-10, pg 3-8; Senate Report 93-549 pg.186.
The I.R.S. is a member of the International Police Crime Organization supplying information to
150 foreign powers -- 22 U.S.C.A. 263(a); 22 U.S.C.A. 285(G) & 287; 22 U.S.C.A. 6103 (k)(4);
United States Government Manual 1990-91 Pg. 385
I.R.S. Agents are trained under the Division of Human Services and the I.R.S. Commissioner
under the Office of Personal Management. The Office of Personal Management is under the
Director of the Secretary General of the United Nations -- 1976 Edition of 22 U.S.C.A. 287; 1979
Supp III pg. 474; Executive Order No. 10422; Treasury Delegation Order 92

Sec.17              Title 15--Commerce and Trade      Page 148
Sec. 17 Antitrust laws not applicable to labor organizations.
"The labor of a human being is not a commodity or article of commerce.
Nothing contained in the anti-trust law shall be construed to forbid the existence
and operation of labor, agricultural, or horticultural organizations, instituted for
the purposes of mutual help, and not having capital stock or conducted for profit,
or to forbid or restrain individual members of such organizations from lawfully
carrying out the legitimate objects thereof; nor shall such organizations, or the
members thereof, be held or construed to be illegal combinations or conspiracies
in restraint of trade, under the antitrust laws.
(Oct. 15, 1914 ch.323, sec. 6, 38 Stat. 731.)

    "W-4 is only for government employees" -- Title 5 U.S.C. 2105

    "Income excludes wages, salaries, and tips" -- Graves vs. People of N.Y.
exrel O'Keefe 59 S.Ct 595 (1939)

    "AGENTS...Our tax system is based on voluntary assessment and voluntary
compliance....the material contained in this handbook is confidential in character.
It must not under any circumstances be made available to persons outside the
service." -- Mr. Mortimer Caplan, IRS Commissioner

    "Our system of taxation is based on voluntary assessment and payment, not
upon distraint. [Distraint means force] -- Flora vs. U.S., 362 US 145

    ""[The I.R.S.] taxes only income 'derived' from many different [U.S.] sources;
One does not 'derive income' by rendering services and charging for them." --
Edwards vs. Keith, 231 Fed. Rep. 113

    "No inference, implication or presumption of legislative construction shall be
drawn or made by reason of the location or grouping of any particular section or
provision or portion of this title {26}, nor shall any table of contents, table of
cross-references, or similar outline, analysis or descriptive matter relating to the
contents of this Title be given any legal effect." -- IRC Section 7806(b)

    " estate or trust, as the case may be, the income of which comes from
sources without [federal] the United States which is not effectively connected
with the [performance of the functions of a public office] within the [federal]
United States, is not includeable in gross income under subtitle A." -- IRC Section

"Anyone may so arrange his affairs that his taxes shall be as low as possible; he is not 
bound to choose that pattern which will best pay the Treasury."
-Judge Learned Hand, Helvering v. Gregory (1934)

Social Security Number
"There is no Social Security law requiring that one have a number, but the IRS
Tax Code, section 6109 subsection A, stipulates that taxpayers shall utilize their
Social Security numbers when filing tax returns. Therefore, if one pays taxes, one
must have a Social Security number." -- Letter from Lloyd Bentson, U.S. Senator from Texas

    "It shall be unlawful for any federal, state or government agency [including
businesses within the federal United States] to deny to any individual any right,
benefit or privilege provided by law because of such individual's refusal to disclose
his/her Social Security Account Number."
"Actual damages sustained by the individual as a result of the refusal or failure,
but in no case shall a person entitled to recovery receive less than the sum of
$1,000.00 the costs of the action together with reasonable attorney fees
determined by the court." -- Privacy Act of 1974

    "The purpose of this [Privacy] Act is to provide certain safeguards for an
individual against invasion of personal privacy by requiring Federal agencies...
to permit an individual  to determine what records pertaining to him are collected,
maintained, used, or disseminated by such agencies." -- Public Law 93-579

Right to Keep and Bear Arms 

"...while the legislature has the power in the most comprehensive manner to regulate 
the carrying and use of firearms, that bodyhas no power to constitute it a crime 
for a person, alien or citizen, to possess a revolver for the legitimate defense of 
himself and his property. The provisions in the Constitution granting the right to 
all persons to bear arms is a limitation upon the power of the
legislature to enact any law to the contrary."

"The police power of the state to preserve public safety and peace and to regulate 
the bearing of arms cannot fairly be restricted to the mere establishment of 
conditions under which all sorts of weapons may be privately possessed, 
but it may account of the character and ordinary use of weapons and interdict 
those whose customary employment by individuals is to violate the law. The
power is, of course subject to the limitation that its exercise be reasonable and it 
cannot constitutionally result in the prohibition of the possession of those 
arms which, by the common opinion and usage of law-abiding people, are 
proper and legitimate to be kept upon private premises for the protection 
of person and property."

"The right of the people peacefully to assemble for lawful purposes existed long 
before the adoption of the Constitution of the United States. In fact, it is and always 
has been one of the attributes of a free government. It 'derives its source,' to use the
language of Chief Justice Marshall, in Gibbons v. Ogden, 9 Wheat. 211, 'from those 
laws whose authority is acknowledged by civilized man throughout the world.' 
It is found wherever civilization exists. It was not, therefore, a right granted to the 
people by the Constitution. Neither is it in any manner dependent upon that 
instrument for its existence. The second Amendment declares that it shall not be 
infringed ; but this, as has been seen, means no more than it shall not be infringed by 
Congress. This is one of the amendments that has no other effect than to restrict the 
powers of the National Government..."

"The rifle of all descriptions, the shot gun, the musket and repeater are such arms; and 
that under the Constitution the right to keep and bear arms cannot be infringed or 
forbidden by the legislature."
-ANDREWS V. STATE; 50 TENN. 165, 179, 8 AM. REP. 8, 14 (TENNESSEE SUPREME COURT, 1871) 

"...we incline to the opinion that the Legislature cannot inhibit the citizen from bearing 
arms openly, because it authorizes him to bear them for the purposes of defending 
himself and the State, and it is only when carried openly, that they can be efficiently 
used for defence."
-STATE V. REID, 1 ALA. 612, 619, 35 AM. DEC. 47 (1840)

"...the right to keep arms necessarily involves the right to purchase them, to keep them 
in a state of efficiency for use, and to purchase and provide ammunition suitable for 
such arms, and to keep them in repair."
-ANDRES V. STATE, 50 TENN. (3 Heisk) 165, 178; (1871)

"The practical and safe construction is that which must have been in the minds of those 
who framed our organic law. The intention was to embrace the 'arms', an 
acquaintance with whose use was necessary for their protection against the usurpation 
of illegal power - such as rifles, muskets, shotguns, swords and pistols. "These are but 
little used now in war; still they are such weapons that they or their like can still 
be considered as 'arms', which the people have a right to bear."
-STATE V. KERNER, 181 NC 574, 107 SE 222, 224-25 (NORTH CAROLINA SUPREME COURT, 1921.

"If the text and purpose of the Constitutional guarantee relied exclusively on the 
preference for a militia 'for defense of the State' then the terms 'arms' most likely 
would include only the modern day equivalents of the weapons used by the Colonial 
Militia Men."
-STATE V. KESSLER, 289 OR. 359, 369, 614 P.2D 94, 99 (OREGON SUPREME COURT, 1980)

"To prohibit a citizen from wearing or carrying a war an unwarranted restriction 
upon the constitutional right to keep and bear arms. If cowardly and dishonorable men 
sometimes shoot unarmed men with army pistols or guns, the evil must be
prevented by the penitentiary and gallows, and not by a general deprivation of 
constitutional privilege."
-WILSON V. STATE, 33 ARK 557, AT 560, 34 AM. REP.. 52, AT 54. (1878).

" 'The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.' The right of the 
whole people, old and young, men, women, and boys, and not militia only, to keep 
and bear arms of every description, and not such merely as are used by the militia, shall 
not be infringed, curtailed, or broken in upon, in the smallest degree; and all for the 
important end to be attained: the rearing up and qualifying a well-regulated militia, so 
vitally necessary to the security of a free state. Our opinion is that any law, State or Federal,
is repugnant to the Constitution, and void, which contravenes this right."
-NUNN V. STATE, 1 GA. (1 KEL.) 243, AT 251 (1846)

"[T]he right to keep and bear arms guaranteed by the second amendment to the 
federal constitution is not carried over into the
fourteenth amendment so as to be applicable to the states."
STATE V. AMOS, 343 SO. 2D 166, 168 (LA. 1977)

Illegal Search, Seizure, and Unlawful Police Actions

Commenting upon police powers, he said "Yet if the individual is no longer to be
sovereign, if the police can pick him up whenever they do not like the cut of his
jib, if they can "sieze" and "search" him in their discretion, we enter a new regime."
Justice Douglas in Terry v. State of Ohio, 88 S.Ct. 1868 (1889)

"As in the case of illegal arrests, the officer is bound to know these fundamental
rights and priveliges, and must keep within the law at his peril."
Thiede v. Town of Scandia Valley, 217 Minn. 218, 231 14N.W. (2d) 400 (1944)

    "No suit can be sustained against a state; but an unconstitutional law affords no justification to a state officer for an act injurious to an individual. The officer is
not the state, and can set up no exemption under it, unless he act within
the authority of law." Astrom v Hammond (1842), 2 Fed.Cas, 71, Fed.Cas.No. 596, 3 Mclean 107.

    "No officer can acquire jurisdiction by deciding he has it. The officer, whether judicial or ministerial, decides at his own peril."Middleton v. Low (1866), 30 C. 596, citing Prosser v. Secor (1849), 5 Barb.(N.Y) 607, 608.

    "The innocent individual who is harmed by an abuse of governmental authority
is assured that he will be compensated for his injury." Owens v. City of Independence,
100 S.Ct 1398 (1980)

    " ...If one individual does not possess such a right over the conduct of another
[Good and Lawful Christian Man], no number of individuals [in a deliberative
body] can possess such a right. All combinations, therefore, to effect such an
object, are injurious, not only to the individuals particularly oppressed, but to the
public at large."People v. Fisher, 14 Wend.(N.Y.) 9, 28 Am.Dec. 501

    "Non dat qui non habet---He gives nothing who has nothing."Bouvier's Law
Dictionary (1914),"Maxim,"p.2149, [No legislative body or man can convey any authority or
jurisdiction he does not possess over common Rights vested by God to another. Because legislative
powers are limited, all powers derived from legislative acts are limited.]

Jury Rights and Nullification
"The jury has the right to judge both the law as well as the fact..." -- John Jay,
1st Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court 1789

    "The pages of history shine on instances of the jury's exercise of it's prerogative
to disregard instructions of the judge..." -- U.S. vs. Dougherty, 473 F.2nd. 1113, 1139,1972

"Uniform Commercial Code"
"The entire taxing and monetary systems are hereby placed under the U.C.C. (Uniform Commercial Code)" -- The Federal Tax Lien Act of 1966


Here is a List of Relevant Books & Videos : To Read a Comprehensive Summary or to Order, Click on the Item : Items marked with a " * " are in stock and may be ordered. Any Books in the Catalog Marked with a (@) are carried by and most may be ordered. Some are "Out of Print", but if you follow the link,, and have them do a used-bookstore search, they will get back to you with a couple of weeks. Items marked (In Stock) are carried by me and must be purchased through me by Postal Money Order or E-Gold. If Ordering with E-Gold, make sure to contact me me by E-mail first to verify that I have the Items you are looking for. Thank you.

Related Books

THE RAPE OF JUSTICE--Eustace Mullins - 535 P. -

* MAXIMS OF LAW - Compiled and edited by Charles A. Weisman - 1995 - 112 P. -

* WAR & EMERGENCY POWERS : A Special Report on the National Emergency in the United States - Dr. Eugene Schroeder - 153 P. -

* Emergency Power Statutes--Report of the Special Committee on the Termination of  the National Emergency - (REPRINT) - 5 P. -




* THE RIGHT TO TRAVEL : Liberty or License ?  - Charles A. Weisman -

* THE RIGHT TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS - Charles A. Weisman - 1994 - 112 P. -


* CRIMINAL LAW AND PROCEDURE : Pleading, Right to Trial by Jury - (REPRINT) - 21 p. -

* THE LAW - (REPRINT)--Fred Bastiat - 1850 - 37 P. -


Related Videos

* WAR & EMERGENCY POWERS : A Special Report on the National Emergency in the U.S. - Eugene Shroeder - Hosted by T. Spain -

* JUDICIAL CORRUPTION" - Marvin Bryer - Granada Forum - 10-9-97 -

* BLACK SOVEREIGNTY AND THE 14th AMENDMENT - Dr. Robert Brock Concerned Citizens of the South Bay -

* FORMING JURAL SOCIETIES" - John Quade - Granada Forum - 4-13-95 -


* STATE CITIZENSHIP--Tape # 2--Richard McDonald - To be viewed along with Introduction Manual -

* L.A. LAWMAN - "Nothing in Common" - Richard McDonald - Hosted by Greg Meadows -

* MONTANA FREEMEN : Sweitzer / Peterson-Lien Seminar and Common Law Course - 1995 - 3 - 2 Hr. Tapes -

THE FREEMEN OF MONTANA : A Threat to the International Banksters ? - Jack McLamb - 1 Hr. -

* RECLAIMING YOUR SOVEREIGN CITIZENSHIP - Johnny Liberty - Grenada Forum - 5-25-95 -


* LIBERTY IN THE BALANCE--America, the Fed, and the IRS - Mosaic Media -

* THE BUCK ACT - Mosaic Media -

* ELEMENTS OF A COURT - Mosaic Media - 1/2 Hour -

* JURY RIGHTS & POWERS" - Peyman Mottahedeh - Grenada Forum - 11-13-97 -

* HOW TO WALK A CASE THROUGH COURT" - Jim Mattatall - Concerned Citizens of the South Bay - 2-3-98 -

HOW TO USE THE U.C.C--Howard Freeman-

* STATE CITIZENSHIP SEMINAR - (Monthly Meeting) - Richard McDonald - Beverly Garland - 8-3-96 -

* STATE CITIZENSHIP SEMINAR - (Monthly Meeting) - Richard McDonald - Beverly Garland - 9-7-96 -

* STATE CITIZENSHIP SEMINAR - (Monthly Meeting) - Richard McDonald - Beverly Garland - 11-2-96

* STATE CITIZENSHIP SEMINAR - (Monthly Meeting) - Richard McDonald - Beverly Garland - 12-7-96 -

* STATE CITIZENSHIP SEMINAR - (Monthly Meeting) - Richard McDonald - Beverly Garland - 1-4-97 -

* STATE CITIZENSHIP SEMINAR - (Monthly Meeting) - Richard McDonald - Beverly Garland - 3-1-97 -

* STATE CITIZENSHIP SEMINAR - (Monthly Meeting) - Richard McDonald - Beverly Garland - 12-6-97 -