The Occult Matrix
Recently Updated as of 2017 - This Website is Completely AD FREE - Please Support Me Via Paypal, Promoted Products and Bitcoin, Etherium Or Ripple

Welcome Page About Me Announcements Personal Writings Knowledge Base News Articles
Video Links Digital Downloads Shop Store Suggested Reading Links Page Contact Me

Credo Mutwa Reptilians

 

Reality Update :

By THE INFORMER
   The cold reality of truth hits you when you see your freedom and liberty taken from you by
reprobates. Reprobates abound in this country, so much so that they permeate the legislative,
executive, and judicial branches of an entity called government.
    Who are reprobates? All lawyers and the king and his congress or state legislators. The
Almighty, called different names by various religions, asked the people why they wanted a king?
After they gave their reasons He said fine, but you can't have two masters so don't expect anything
from me.
    Well in today's world the people's king is the president of the United States. They had the
governors of the states as their first king until the United States took control of the states and made
them political subdivisions. The people, not all by the way, view the various kings with awe. They
vote the governors and president into office at elections time.
    They have no idea they are the chief executive officers (CEO) of a corporation, just like the
CEO of General Motors. How can they be free when they elect the king and his knights (congress
or legislatures of the states) who in turn dictate to the people what, when, where, and how to live
their lives. They don't tell the people why. The people become slaves and peons to the corporation
they vote into. They just can't pull out like when they own stock in G.M and call it in. It is different,
because whom do they fall back on for their protection, other than themselves? Do they try to fall
back on the Almighty? Yes, but what did the Almighty say 2000 years ago? Did you make your
choice? Do you know why your prayers are not answered now? People want to be controlled
because they would rather be secure, not take responsibility for their own lives. Now the king and
his henchmen, which are the murderers and robber barons that Lysander Spooner talked about in
his book, "No Treason :  The Constitution of No Authority," hide behind that "government" veil for
protection and claim you owe your soul to support their greed. They claim to follow the by-laws
of their constitutions and claim that the constitution is YOURS, the peoples.
    Of course, this is nonsense and an absurdity at it's ultimate. It's only yours if you join their
commercial organization of law merchants. They tout that it protects you, but the cold hard reality
hits home when you can't do the simple things like work without a license (SSN), traveling without
getting a license, building a private home without a permit, or fixing the home without getting a
permit, paying a rent tax on property they claim you own, but in reality they do, just to name a few.
    This corporation of CEO's kings, if you will, control Grand Juries and their own courts. There is
no such thing as the private people's courts  wherein justice can be obtained. There are no courts
for the people of America to protect their rights given to them by the Almighty. Why? Because
they wanted another master, which turns out to be a commercial entity called government with their
king president and/or governors. When the Constitution for the United States was created by those
select few wanting to take control of the States, Patrick Henry said he was no longer a Virginian,
but only an American, see 1788 Virginia Debates.
    I have been in the trenches for ten years, on the front lines for 5 years. The only thing I have
learned is that there is no foundational stability in the "patriot" movement. By that I mean, and the
following questions has to lead into it because most all "patriots" understand this part. The
non-patriot does not;
    1) What are the two most important commandments that the others are based upon?
    2) Have you elected someone to take control over your life through representation?
    3) Did you vote for the corporate CEO of a State?
    4) Did you vote for the CEO of the main headquarters located in the coti of Washington D.C.?
    5) Do you know that even your county government is a commercial political subdivision of the
        State?
    6) Do you have control over your neighbors property?
    7) Can you limit his freedoms to work, travel and the like?
    8) Does he have the same, if any, control over you?
    9) Have you elected someone in government, whether Federal, State, County, or town to 
control his life?
  10) Why have you voted for a group of men in the county that have taken control over your
         neighbor's property by taxing his land?
  11) Have you read II Kings 23:32-33?
  12) Do you really know what the real reason the States and United States were created.
  13) For your protection?
  14) When your freedoms are taken, how is that protection? Think Again!
  15) When was the first time you ever thought and answered these questions and have not done 
any research other than what other people have told you?
    Putting all the yes's and no's together side by side, how did you fare? If the yes's outnumbered 
the no's, then why complain your rights have been taken? You got what you deserved when 
choosing a new master over the Almighty. If the no's outnumbered the yes's , then you are 
screwed by mob rule of democracy and there is nothing you can do about it. You will never win in 
the lawyer-merchant courts. That is the cold, hard reality, believe me, I am living proof of that, as 
are thousands, if not millions of others in my position that the CEO's underlings have persecuted.
    Grand Jury protection? Lets get real, as the many case law and state attorneys general will tell
you, the Grand Jury is an arm of the court and controlled by the courts so the other reprobates, 
their prosecutors, can use it as their tool. This is why you can't get into a Grand Jury hearing to 
protect yourself. This hearing is nothing more than a probable cause hearing controlled by the 
executive branch lawyer prosecutor. The Attorney General of South Carolina told a man that in 
order for him to present a case to the State Grand Jury, he must first apply to the prosecutor to 
decide whether the complaint is worthy of presenting. This is not the people's Grand Jury, it is the 
commercial State's Grand Jury. Are you people , who are not "patriots", starting to see that YOU 
are the PROBLEM. Here is a case that states; "Grand Jury exercises broad investigative powers 
and generally has both right and duty to procure everyman's evidence." in re: Grand Jury,821 F2d 
946, since the very purpose of the Grand Jury is to ascertain probable cause, Blair v. U.S., 250 
U.S. at 282.
     If you are considered "everyman", why can't you appear at a grand jury investigating you?
Because the kings you elected into office usurped power and decreed you list your rights to 
present exculpatory evidence. You have a new master. This goes against what the court stated in
Wood v. Georgia, 370 U.S. 375, 390, "Certainly the most celebrated function of the grand jury is 
to stand between the government and the citizen, and thereby protect the latter from harassment 
and unfounded prosecution." I believe in Hale v. Hinkle, 201 U.S. at 61, they said that your kings 
have "destroyed the proper functionings of the grand jury, as it is to be the servent of neither the
government, nor the courts, but of the people."
     People, come on, use some logic. This can and has happened because YOU, the masses of 
asses voted your new master into office and allowed the king and his henchmen, all the way down 
to the county level, to sell you out to a greater king called the United Nations. This was done with 
the express cooperation of the reprobates (every member of the private Bar Association), from 
1947 to present. This allowed your vote to be used against you to be involved in a joint-venture 
with other nations kings. Don't you just love what you did? I'm talking mostly to those  who are 
not in my choir and patriots that love to be citizens (stockholders) of the commercial 
establishments called states. Now it is simple logic that tells you that if you are all of the same 
persuasion, you can all sit on the Grand or Petit Jury against other law-merchant peers and can do 
secret hearings against them so they don't destroy your scam to control others that are not of your 
persuasion. Huh?
     Now your representatives you elected can and have the right under YOUR by-laws that you
consented to at Article I, Section 2, Clause 3, to tax you and the same goes for the states.
Representation and taxation goes together and you voluntarily consented. Just like the First 
Judiciary Act of 1789 stated that ALL jurisdiction is based upon consent. For the life of me, I still 
cannot understand why "patriots" still insist on becoming stockholders (citizens of) a particular 
commercial organization (state), when Patrick Henry refused to claim to be a citizen of the state of 
Virginia. He was a true Patriot, if that's what you want to label him. Didn't you voters join a 
"political party"? Have you ever read Aber J. Nock's, "Our Enemy the State"? Didn't he say the 
"political body" destroys rights and is not designed to protect rights? I think you better read it to 
get some foundational basis for "political body."
     Land.    Who provided the land you live on in the first place, those previous people elected into
office? Try reading the Bible, again II Kings. Do your kings claim you owe them and their 
henchmen a tax to live on their land? Yup, they sure do, because you consented to a new master 
who usurped the real master's position. Try reading Deuteronomy 17;14-20. What law should a 
king use according to scripture? Does your king abide by this Bible verse? Who took the land he 
gave you to live upon and claimed you owed "them": a tax? Who is "them?" Who voted "them" 
into office? Why? If you didn't vote "them" into office but your next door neighbor did, why did 
you allow him to hire thugs to steal your property when individually neither he nor you can? Did 
you vote "them" into office so you could steal your neighbor's property (money, etc.) to offset 
some debt "them" created for your welfare? If you did, then by your consent, freely given that you 
are the citizen (stockholder) who elected the CEO of the commercial political body to do as they 
wish to protect and support the commercial law merchant establishment at your and his expense. 
Just like the CEO at GM has to protect the corporation at the expense of the individual 
stockholder, even to the confiscation of some stock by manipulating stock buyouts. This is called 
inflation to control the citizen stockholder.
     The real people who created this monstrosity called the states and United States, the law
merchants, wrote the by-laws (constitutions) so that the law merchants would not be allowed to
encroach upon non law merchants. As ou can see, law merchants are crafty people. Look at used
car salesmen and lawyers. If they can coerce and intimidate you into buying or using their services
it is caveat emptor. If the king CEO and his henchmen (congress and legislatures of states) can
convince you that you are a part of their system and you consent, so be it. Oh, they say, it's your duty to vote! Why don't you just come down to register? It's so easy and you would keep our 
party in power. We can't let the other side win and take away your rights, now can we? AHH, 
shrewd criminals aren't they? Remember, there was only one group of people and no "parties" in 
the beginning. Parties make no difference when the same commercial organization is to create debt.
     So, you want justice? If you believe that the people in general created the constitutions, (you do
believe in Santa, don't you?), then "we" have the right to form our own Grand Jury of America, 
indict the reprobates from the CEO all the way down to the lowly scum of the earththat the 
Almighty wished seven Woe's upon, the judges/lawyer merchants, and take back our country. We 
need the militia to be the equivalent of the U.S. Marshals, which, by the way, is a private concern 
like the IRS, to enforce the arrest and trial of the usurpers and tyrants in our, the people's court 
under the law of  the Almighty, Deut. 17:14. Kick out the United Nations. Create our own banks 
as was done in 1841 and 1846 to deal in real substance and totally control corporations that left 
this country and want to come back in when we start to prosper. KEEP THE INCOME TAX!  What? you say. That's right it is a corporate income tax for those people who want limited liability 
to do business under license. After all, how would this country and it's law merchants survive in a
commercial world? Put those on notice, the CEO and all those under him and Congress and 
State legislators that any more encroachments on the Liberty and Freedom of a private man would 
be treason and subject to either the death penalty or banishment from this country after all his 
possessions and wealth have been taken from him. Now, don't you think that will keep them on
the straight and narrow? Oh, one thing more, no lawyers allowed in the congress or legislature, 
and none allowed in the executive branch of government. Furthermore, the violation of the 
practice of law be abolished. The next friend could represent you in OUR courts, which would be 
seperate from the law merchants courts they have today. 
The great writ of Habeas Corpus would be set up to assure it works. Judges would not have to 
be lawyers, just like it was in the old days of logic and common sense. The bane of mankind has 
always been lawyers, See Matthew 23 and Luke 11:27-54. As Bastiat said; "Let's try freedom for 
a change," by limiting congress and legislators of states to two terms maximum at the mean average
income of the American worker. That way they have to suffer with the laws they write as their only 
job is to protect this country from foreign invasion and from domestic invasion from foreign 
operatives. It is not a lifetime job to legislate no matter how good they seem to be. Plus, they get
no retirement, they go back out on the street and get a job like the rest of us.
Now, let's touch briefly the great writ of habeas corpus. It is not what people in the patriot 
community think it is. It does not get you out of jail in three days or even in twenty days. 
Generally, those applying for writs of habeus fail. From 1947 to 1957 only 1.4% were 
successful. You can check this out in the case of Fay v. Noia, 83  S.Ct.  822(1963) which is one 
of the leading cases referred to in other cases. In most cases, if you were fortunate to be one of 
the 1.4%  to win the release, it will not be immediate. The lawyer merchants have seen to it that
the Federal District Courts will permit the State courts an opportunity to correct the constitutional
error found by the District Court. Typically, the district court will order the State court to retry you
within a specific time frame and at the end of that time if they don't, then you are set free. Not what
you thought it to be, is it? The way the courts work, it could take months to upwards of two years.
So forget about the great writ helping you. I know first hand what they can do and the above is 
correct as it happened to me and others I have come to know. You stand a better chance on 
appeal in their state appellate courts. How much better? Maybe 1.8%, but i'll go 2% to be safe.
What do you want people, cold hard reality or nice mushy lip service of what things ought to
be? Even when I filed a 28 USC 1651 writ that does not require exhaustion of state remedies, the 
Federal Court still insisted on using a 28 USC 2254, even though I was not a state prisoner, not
yet even to trial, and when convicted they still used 2254 even though I was not sentenced. I was
in physical custody, but that is NOT required for a habeas. You can be on parole, 371 US 236; 
at large on ROR pending sentencing, 411 US 345; released on bail pending final disposition, 95
S.Ct. 886; or on probation, 372 F2d 641. The real question is how much restraint of one's 
liberty is necessary before the right to apply for the writ is required. Remember, your failure to
raise terms of federal constitutional questions can constitute a procedural default as only federal
constitutional rights violated can apply to a habeas, Murry v. Carrier, 106 S.Ct. 2639,
2547-2648(1986). The king you elected controls everything. I have used the Magna Carta in a 
case and lost. The adversaries attorney commented to another attorney by letter, of which I have
a copy, stating "So much for the Magna Charta." Well, what did you expect from law merchant
reprobates?
Today, the king you elected has abdicated his office and allowed one of his henchmen to take 
over. That is the governor of the International Monetary Fund doing business as the Secretary
of the Treasury. This office holder, Robert Rubin, is the knight of the real king, the United Nations
controlled by the World Bank owners. Who are they? The money changers!
Well what else do you want to hear, that he, the Almighty will come down and rapture you out
of the mess YOU created by electing kings andjoining their baal? Read Daniel 3:1-13. Let's face
it, that is cold hard reality and those "patriots" that really know what is going on, don't stand a snowballs chance in hell to correct it on winning in"THEM'S" courts. Never forget this, people of 
minds like mine, all courts in this country ARE THEIR'S, they are NOT YOURS by any stretch of 
the imagination just like the constitution is not yours. 
Lysander Spooner in a letter to Thomas F. Bayard in 1882, May 22, expressing the 
Constitution this way, which "THEM" can't, by any stretch of sophistry deny;  "...for what is the
Constitution? It is at best, a writing that was drawn up more than ninety years ago: was assented 
to at the time only by a small number of men: ...Those men have long since been dead. They never 
had any right of arbitrary dominion over even their contemporaries; and they never had any over us.
Their wills or wishes have no more rightful authority over us, than have the wills or wishes of men 
that lived before the flood. They never personally signed, sealed, acknowledged, or delivered the 
instrument which they imposed upon the country as law. They never, in any open and authentic 
manner, bound even themselves to obey it, or made themselves personally responsible for the acts
of their so-called agents under it. They had no natural right to impose it, as law, upon a single 
human being. The whole proceeding was pure usurpation. In practice, the Constitution has been
an utter fraud from the beginning. Professing to have been "ordained and established" by 'we the people of the United States', it has never been submitted to them as individuals, for their voluntary
acceptance or rejection."
The final conclusion is stated by Bastiat in "The Law"; "God has given to men all that is 
necessary for them to accomplish their destinies. He has provided a social form as well as a human 
form. And these social organs of persons are so constituted that they will develop themselves
harmoniously in the clear air of liberty. Away, then, with quacks and organizers! Away with their
rings, chains, hooks and pincers! Away with their artificial systems! Away with their whims of 
governmental administrators, their socialized projects, their centalization, their tariffs, their 
government schools, their state religions, their free credit, their bank monopolies, their regulation,
their restrictions, their equalization by taxation, and their pious moralizations! 
And now that the legislatore and do-gooders have so futilely inflicted  so many systems upon 
society, may they finally end where they should have began : May they reject all systems, and try 
liberty; for liberty is an acknowledgement in the faith in God and His works."
Forget about 1983 actions, torts, and the like as they are for those slaves involved in the 
system. Until we have formed our own courts of justice we will never prevail against the system.
You can only use their courts to prevail against another slave. 
The cold, hard reality is that we have only two choices. One, form our own courts and police 
officers, which would be the militia, to enforce the filings. Two, follow what Thomas Jefferson
had to say, "God forbid we should ever be twenty years without such a rebellion...And what 
country can preserve it's liberties, if it's rulers are not warned from time to time, that this people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms...The tree of liberty must be refreshed from
time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."  and implement what Madison had to say in Federalist Paper #28. The Declaration of Independance rules over that miserable commercial 
document called the Constitution and spells out number two's choice in it's second paragraph. 
Forget about the masses of asses who will scream you are the anarchists when overthrowing the 
Constitution. In reality you are NOT overthrowing the Constitution, you are getting rid of scummy reprobates that have already overthrown the Constitution that is to keep "THEM" in Check. Don't
even think about doing it individually, because collectively we don't have six million people with
conviction to oust the reprobate usurpers. This is the 5% of the population that equates to the 5%
that fought the revolutionary war. But remember, then the enemy was an ocean away. Today, you
elected "THEM" into your backyard. Disgusting set of circumstances you put yourself into, HUH?
And you, average, Mr. and Mrs. America, are gragging the rest of us down with you. Again read
Daniel 3. So, elect your king by voting them back into office, so you can say, as you complain and
grovel before them when you are forced to pay your "fair share" into the communistic takeover, 
Hail to the One-World Order. Have a rotten day. 
Written by the Informer in September 1995, while in Jail.